Search for: "United States v. Archie"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984), fn. 6; United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
United States, 11-6096, Hyde v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:49 am
Discrimination EEOC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
United States, in which the justices ruled that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force, for this blog. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
March 14, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit made an inexplicably horrible decision relating to a photographer's copyright in an image used in sex trafficking. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
March 14, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit made an inexplicably horrible decision relating to a photographer's copyright in an image used in sex trafficking. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
March 14, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit made an inexplicably horrible decision relating to a photographer's copyright in an image used in sex trafficking. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:52 pm
Though the courts point to Archie MD, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the existing campaign laws, as reaffirmed by Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:25 am
(See Pickering v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
For example, the definition of integrity is certainly narrower in the United Kingdom, than what is the case elsewhere: under Section 80 (2) CDPA a derogatory "treatment" is indeed required. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
On the same day HHJ Henson QC lifted an order made under s45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, which had forbidden the media from identifying George and Archie Tilley. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
The Court stated that, as a general matter, “[a] service provider is not, we think, permitted willful blindness. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
