Search for: "United States v. Articles of Hazardous Substance"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 3:00 pm
Briefly put, a valid ETS requires (1) a grave danger to employees from an agent that is a toxic substance, physically harmful, or a new hazard, and (2) that the emergency regulation is “necessary. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:58 am
United States, and can be read here: Supreme Court Opinion The New York Times article can be read here: Justices Limit Liability Over Toxic Spill Cases [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
A change in a substance’s categorization in the International Agency for Research on Cancer’s treatment of cancer “hazards” will often initiate a mass tort by stirring interest in the lawsuit industry. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm
CRECs arise from a past release of a hazardous substance that has been addressed to the satisfaction of regulators, but carry some implementation of controls, like a drinking water restriction. [read post]
You Cannot Just Read the Regulations to Understand Stormwater Permitting for Oil and Gas Activities!
25 Jul 2013, 8:02 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 526 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:56 am
Asbestos has not been produced in the United States for decades, and while it is still being imported in small quantities, the real danger lies in the asbestos that fills many of the older buildings in Boston and the rest of the nation. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY City of Duarte v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
., airplanes, trains, subways, buses, taxis, ride-shares, ferries, ships, trolleys, and cable cars) into or within the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
What is relevant to the current debate with Foster Farms boils down to the definition of the term “adulterated,” which is defined in the statute as: (1) if it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health; but in case the substance is not an added substance, such article shall not be considered adulterated under this clause if the quantity of such substance in or on such article does… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
Defendant did not dispute any of this nor that the product was a toxic, hazardous substance designed to kill. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
United States EPA (2021) U.S.Dist.LEXIS 163921.) [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
This article was published in Rigzone on February 16, 2012. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
According to the CDC, it is estimated that 1.4 million cases of salmonellosis occur each year in the United States. [read post]
