Search for: "United States v. Ashburn" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 1:57 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Supp. 3d 239, 246 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) (finding error rates between 0.9 and 1.5% to favor admission of expert testimony); United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
[6/9/09 PM Update:  The United States Supreme Court just cleared the Chrysler sale! [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
According to a paper completed by Rutgers Law School Professor Sabrina Safrin, caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases have no effect on a procedure that’s among the most commonly undertaken in operating rooms across the United States: cesarean sections. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
According to a paper completed by Rutgers Law School Professor Sabrina Safrin, caps on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases have no effect on a procedure that’s among the most commonly undertaken in operating rooms across the United States: cesarean sections. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 The doctrine can be traced to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in South v. [read post]