Search for: "United States v. Atkins" Results 41 - 60 of 287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
Shepherd) a law review article concluding that the whole United States tort system is unjustifiable, specifically because it doesn't deter effectively. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167 (6th Cir.1995), that competency determinations are mixed questions of law and fact, it concluded that the subsequent United States Supreme Court holding in Thompson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
“I appreciate Governor Newsom’s continued commitment to solving one of the most vexing issues facing our state – increasing the amount of housing and widening access for more Californians,” said Senate Pro Tem Atkins (D-San Diego). [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm by Tim Clancy
The appeals court made their decision to follow the holding of Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:40 am
Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to execute offenders with mental retardation in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm by Lovechilde
  In  2002, United States Supreme Court, in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:25 pm
Neither Berry's allegations, nor the United States Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Baze v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Hill in the category of citizens protected from capital punishment by the 2002 United States Supreme Court decision Atkins v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:56 am
Both also agreed that the death specifications outweighed mitigation beyon a reasonable doubt and therefore affirmed his death sentence.In 2002, the United States Supreme Court decided Atkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
United States ,1944 An article in the Washington Post on court nominees refusing to answer questions about Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
By Michael Hansen  On February 22, California State Assembly Member Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, introduced a bill, AB 1229, to restore the ability of California cities and counties to require affordable housing as part of market-rate housing developments. [read post]