Search for: "United States v. Atlantic Commission Co." Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2012, 10:31 pm by Leland E. Beck
Drug Compounding and Competition:  The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in K-V Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
United States Department of Health and Human Services & Kathleen Sebelius, here. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
That distinguishes us from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand which all have constitutional or rights charter requirements that proposed laws must be considered for their potential impact on free expression. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  He currently serves as the Co-Vice Chair and Secretary of the Financial Institutions Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar (2008 – present). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am by Russell Beck
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
– SKARB KIBICA trade mark dispute(Class 46) Similarity of signs, homogenity of goods – ALT ATLANTIC word-figurative mark case (Class 46) The average consumers’ confusion – ALFOFARM TM dispute(Class 46)     South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal confirms territoriality of IP rights in Gallo Africa v Sting Music (Afro-IP) Seeing Red: colour marks case Henkel AG v Trefoil Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (Afro-IP)     Spain Hints on how to… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm by Vicki Shiah
According to the New York Times, petitioners plan to seek review of the decision by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am by admin
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]