Search for: "United States v. Atlantic Richfield Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am
Atlantic Richfield Co., 990 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1993). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Last term in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:16 am
Atlantic Richfield Co., 51 F.3d 1421, 1433 (9th Cir. 1995). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
This week, in a split 7-2 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court held that Montana state law claims brought by private landowners against Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) for alleged impacts from the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site are not preempted by CERCLA and are not precluded by ARCO’s settlement of EPA’s CERCLA claims; however, any restoration damages awarded to the landowners must be spent on actual… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
This week, in a split 7-2 opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court held that Montana state law claims brought by private landowners against Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) for alleged impacts from the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site are not preempted by CERCLA and are not precluded by ARCO’s settlement of EPA’s CERCLA claims; however, any restoration damages awarded to the landowners must be spent on actual… [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
” At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in environmental clean-up case Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Brian Yablonski and Jonathan Wood look at Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:10 am
The second case argued on Wednesday, Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
When Atlantic Richfield sought review in Atlantic Richfield Company v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am
Los Angeles World Airports, the justices have been asked to decide whether the “market participant” exception to federal pre-emption allows state or local governments to impose a rule that would otherwise be pre-empted on private companies even when the government is not buying anything directly from those companies. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
, v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Atlantic Richfield Company, 866 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2017). [read post]
