Search for: "United States v. Automobile Financing" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 9:30 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
In her first opinion on the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan reports the Justices' 8-1 ruling that a consumer debtor cannot deduct the IRS standard automobile ownership costs from his or her disposable monthly income under the means test if the automobile is free and clear. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Not entirely coincidental was the ability of the United States to finance its government operations with an income tax instead of customs duties. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Center for Civic Mediation and LA County Bar are presenting a program tonight on the law of arbitration: "Will California Arbitration Law Survive the United States Supreme Court?" [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm by Robert Chesney
The second involves the sentencing of a woman who provided material support (financing) to Hezbollah (United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the bankruptcy court's order for the reasons set forth in Tidewater Finance Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Not entirely coincidental was the ability of the United States to finance its government operations with an income tax instead of customs duties. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
There are some 40,000 job classifications in the United States (a figure used by Justice Stephen Breyer today). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
These laws affect a broad range of public and private companies, including U.S. companies as well as foreign companies that conduct business in the United States. [read post]
The end result of the legislative process thus would be a Public Law effectively branding this theory of liability as, in the parlance of Inclusive Communities, a disparate impact claim that is “abusive” of sales finance companies and banks engaged in the automobile sales finance business. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
Nebgen (2nd Dept., decided 4/27/2010) In  Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2nd Dept. 2008), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that "the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]