Search for: "United States v. Bailes" Results 181 - 200 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Eight Amendment Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-113Issue: When, if ever, may a court exercising jurisdiction pursuant to a waiver of sovereign immunity invoke the strict construction canon applicable to such waivers to construe a separate statutory provision that creates the substantive rights at issue. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:10 am by SOIssues
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:45 am by Aurora Barnes
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:42 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari on the substantive constitutional issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm by Ryan Emenaker
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
" Bond has slid down this slope at a fast clip.The top of the slope is here, the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution (don't laugh, it really exists):"Excessive bail shall not be required. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am by Jennifer Davis
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]