Search for: "United States v. Bailes"
Results 21 - 40
of 792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:55 pm
United States, 571 U.S. 204, 134 S. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:28 am
In its justification for the arrest, the state of Georgia cited the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:45 am
However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit overturned the lower court on appeal, finding that Cullman County’s bail system was constitutional. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last month, in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
Dist. of California (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that "pretrial documents, such as those dealing with the question whether [the defendant] should be incarcerated prior to trial … are often important to a full understanding of the way in which the judicial process and the government as a whole are functioning"); United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Courts, of course, have little capacity to bail out distressed localities because they cannot mandate that more centralized governments provide bailout funding to distressed decentralized units. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:23 am
Dist. of California (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that "pretrial documents, such as those dealing with the question whether [the defendant] should be incarcerated prior to trial … are often important to a full understanding of the way in which the judicial process and the government as a whole are functioning"); United States v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
The April 12, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm
One of their many cases, Baker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:06 am
Few New Yorkers have even heard of the Macomb family, or the outsized role they played in New York and United States history. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
