Search for: "United States v. Bain" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 8:52 am by admin
  The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am by Steven Cohen
Bain Capital Private Equity et al – United States District Court – Western District of Tennessee – January 9th, 2024) involves a class action complaint filed by members of the defendant’s cheerleading camps. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:22 am by gmlevine
The District Court stated that “WIPO did not address the validity of Société des Bains‘ trademark and its decision is to be given no deference here,” citing Barcelona.com, Incorporated v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by LindaMBeale
  Wouldn't it be prudent for the people of the United States to have the same prior to "hiring" someone to lead the country[?] [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Bush signed into law a repatriation holiday, or corporate tax holiday, allowing multinational companies holding funds offshore to bring those into the United States at a reduced tax rate of just 5.25%, dramatically lower than the 35% statutory rate. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:55 am by admin
  The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
The company, which has offices in the United States, Europe, the U.K., Asia, and Latin America, will combine management teams and invest in unified global products based on the complementary strengths of both firms. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hill (1987) ("the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers"); United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:01 am
It approaches this age-old problem through the lens of SongByrd, Inc. v. [read post]