Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 241 - 260 of 577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm by Joseph Fishkin
The Amendment’s text reads:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.This powerful piece of constitutional text has ensured for 150 years that whatever else happens to people at the bottom rungs of American society, whose own legal status in our polity may be doubtful, their children, at least, are full legal citizens of the… [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Haiti orphanage founder and a U.S. charity have been awarded more than $14 million combined in damages, after a Maine activist who publicised sexual abuse allegations against them was found guilty of defamation. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:23 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
” The court found that the ALJs’ powers made them “Inferior Officers” under Article II because they exercise “significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
The words “citizens of the United States,” and “citizens of the States,” as employed in the fourteenth amendment, did not change or modify the relations of citizens of the State and nation as they existed under the original Constitution. . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, the case in which the Court reviewed military orders requiring tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry to surrender up to military authorities for indeterminate confinement in detention camps – or be deemed criminals. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by JB
Among its many other virtues, the opinions in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
Clark (9th Cir.1990), overruled on other grounds by United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
 (Under the law of the land, do the other 24 states still face the penalty for not expanding their Medicare eligibility even after NFIB v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
John Marshall (the third Chief Justice): If the government of the United States “were to make a law not warranted by any of the powers enumerated, it would be considered by the judges as an infringement of the Constitution which they are to guard. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:18 am by Kali Borkoski
Pulling the thread on that narrative, Brandwein turned to an “unrecognized milestone”: Justice Bradley’s 1874 opinion in United States v. [read post]