Search for: "United States v. Barrow" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
Publicly funded schools first emerged in the United States in the 1780s. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
A federal judge in California blocked a Biden Administration rule that bars migrants who crossed into the United States from applying for asylum unless they entered the country at an official port of entry or obtained asylum protection in a different country. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am by Glen C. Hansen
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York . . . granted Bernardin's motion to dismiss, holding that Sewell's claims were time-barred under the CFAA's and SCA's applicable two-year statutes of limitations. [read post]