Search for: "United States v. Bartlett"
Results 101 - 120
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:14 am
In Sun Capital Partners III LP v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
He briefed Bartlett before the United States Supreme Court on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am
United States case the Court decided last year. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Bartlett, and American Express v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,” United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
Riegel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Such claims have been blessed by the United States Supreme Court in Riegel and Lohr.Howard, 2013 WL 1130759, at *6-7 (footnotes and citations omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:58 am
Bartlett, No. 12-142 – is being argued in the United States Supreme Court today. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
