Search for: "United States v. Bartlett" Results 101 - 120 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  He briefed Bartlett before the United States Supreme Court on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am by Jack Chin
United States case the Court decided last year. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
Bartlett, and American Express v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am by Joe Consumer
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,”  United  States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm by Bexis
 Such claims have been blessed by the United States Supreme Court in Riegel and Lohr.Howard, 2013 WL 1130759, at *6-7 (footnotes and citations omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:58 am by Bexis
Bartlett, No. 12-142 – is being argued in the United States Supreme Court today. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am by Joe Consumer
  In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States (2012),  to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]