Search for: "United States v. Bartlett"
Results 121 - 140
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
Riegel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Such claims have been blessed by the United States Supreme Court in Riegel and Lohr.Howard, 2013 WL 1130759, at *6-7 (footnotes and citations omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:58 am
Bartlett, No. 12-142 – is being argued in the United States Supreme Court today. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Dale Carpenter discusses the amicus brief he filed in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
And drug companies are deep pockets, so these cases provide one instance after another (Bartlett was another SJS/TENS case) of courts leaning over backwards to justify liability. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:42 pm
See Demahy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
The plaintiff in Arters asserted a “design defect”/“remove from the market” claim à la Bartlett v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:24 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, while Scottie Thomaston of Equality on Trial covers the National Organization for Marriage’s brief in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
We’ve received the same bone-headed response from an appellate court in a branded case, seeWimbush v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Venard had signed as a condition of his membership with the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association (USHPA). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Bartlett v. [read post]
