Search for: "United States v. Battle" Results 81 - 100 of 3,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Battles v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Gene Quinn
Last week the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the latest appeal in the Apple/Samsung epic patent battle. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by Steven D. Schwinn
United States, the case testing whether the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act delegated too much authority to the Attorney General to... [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
EFF: “We filed an amicus brief in a federal appellate case called United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm by Zachary Spilman
Finding first that Appellant introduced deadly force into the situation, thereby eliminating the ability of further escalation, citing United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There has been an epic battle over the scope of religious liberty since 1990 when the Supreme Court decided Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 10:15 am by Barbara Bavis
Robert traced the history of the CRA, starting with the Civil Rights Act of 1875, and explained why this Reconstruction-era act, which served to integrate public accommodations, was ultimately held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Civil Rights Cases of 1883. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:02 pm by Gene Quinn
Yesterday, the Judge Koh of the United States District Court for the Federal Circuit denied Apple's request for a permanent injunction in their ongoing patent war over smartphones with Samsung. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by gstasiewicz
Date: Wednesday, December 8 Time: 2:00 – 3:30 PM ET Location: National Press Club’s Murrow Room. 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045 The panel follows Supreme Court arguments of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 11:13 am by Douglas Berman
In so doing, the Fifth Circuit rejected Molina-Martinez’s contention, based on Supreme Court dicta in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, October 20, 2016, from 2pm to 3pm ET, Gene Quinn will host a free webinar discussion that will explore the genesis of the patent battle between Apple and Samsung, focusing on the design patent infringement fight currently at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]