Search for: "United States v. Bayer"
Results 141 - 160
of 294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Pacific Health Corp., 202 Cal.App.4th 1034 (2012)] and its adoption as a matter of California law of the United States Supreme Court’s analysis in Smith v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
Any hearing will take place in the United States before the AAA using the AAA Supplementary Procedures. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:10 am
United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 11 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm
by Renée Kolar On July 20, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) filed its Motion to Dismiss Lance Armstrong’s Amended Complaint. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 11 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
The Court noted, “Contrary to Armstrong’s apparent belief, pleadings filed in the United States District Courts are not press releases, internet blogs, or pieces of investigative journalism. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Bayer's settlement includes settlement for all United States consumers who purchased the products within a specified timeframe that has yet to be determined. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Bayer's settlement includes settlement for all United States consumers who purchased the products within a specified timeframe that has yet to be determined. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm
Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on June 23, 2011. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. ---, 131 S.Ct. 2368, 2011 WL 768649 (6/16/11) (blogged here) the Supreme Court of the United States held that a District Court's denial of a Rule 23 class certification motion does not prevent separate plaintiffs from seeking certification in a separate state court action. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The Court then explained: The United States Supreme Court, however, in Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm
Concluding that the class claims were not barred as a matter of law, the Bridgeford court relied substantially on the United States Supreme Court decision in Smith v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:26 am
The Yaz law suits have created a nightmare for its victims and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that is supposed to be safeguarding Americans taking this dangerous medication. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:55 pm
The first case, Kelly Sims v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Yup, the United States Supreme Court decided two cases on our top ten list on the same day. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Bayer, 131 S. [read post]
