Search for: "United States v. Bear Marine Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm
The Appeals Court explains that in March 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authorized the states of Oregon, Washington and Idaho to kill up to 85 California sea lions annually at Bonneville Dam. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:22 pm
On October 24, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the National Marine Fisheries Service (Service) determination listing the Beringia Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of the Bearded Seal (Erignathus barbatus nauticus) as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:42 pm
Jan. 7, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld (pdf) a biological opinion issued by the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:28 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:27 am
The Landmark Towers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
Dale Hall, Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively "FWS"), challenging the FWS's legal determination that the listing of the Polar Bear as threatened under the Endangered Species Act creates a ban on the import of sport-hunted polar bear trophies otherwise legal under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:33 pm
From Singh v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
As the opinion notes, one provisionexempts from militia duty "the Vice President of the United States, [executive branch officers and judges], Congressmen, custom house officers, . . . post officers, . . . all Ferrymen employed at any ferry on the post road, . . . all pilots, all mariners actually employed in the sea service of any citizen or merchant within the United States; and all persons who now are or may be hereafter… [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
With American allies already conscripting women, proposals to do the same in the United States appeared within the War Department in 1942. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
Opinion in CBD v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
The 1981 Supreme Court decision, Rostker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:30 am
In The Lands Council, a Ninth Circuit en banc panel decided "to clarify some of our environmental jurisprudence with respect to our review of the actions of the United States Forest Service. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Willard Steam Service, Inc., 321 P.2d 680 (Oklahoma Supreme Court 1958). [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 11:42 am
Yemen and Mauritius v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
