Search for: "United States v. Bear Marine Services" Results 41 - 60 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
    The lifting of the ban places the United States with roughly a dozen other countries that allow women to serve as part of combat units, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Norway. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Bearing this in mind, does the draft AUMF really matter? [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, the United States Supreme Court views an arbitration clause as a specialized kind of forum selection clause, and in December 2013 reiterated the strong presumption in favor of the validity of arbitration provisions in Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 25, 2011  Buffalo Marine Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Schwaegler which are in dispute and not the subject of this hearing, Foss has paid maintenance and cure to Hedges since soon after the injury pursuant to its maritime obligation to pay maintenance and cure to a seaman injured in the service of its vessel. 12. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm by WIMS
National Marine Fisheries Service (Click here for details)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles currently handle up to 64% of all West Coast oceanic shipping, and 35% of all such shipping in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]