Search for: "United States v. Bin Laden" Results 161 - 180 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm by Larkin Reynolds
 Judge Urbina further found that Hatim had “separated himself from the enemy armed forces’ command structure prior to his capture” by leaving the camp when he learned that Osama bin Laden might be visiting. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:51 am by Benjamin Wittes
Not until later did al-Qaida begin publicly calling for attacks against the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:29 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
I don't include the Osama bin Ladens of the world; bin Laden is not credible sitting in a cave in Afghanistan mere feet away from a dialysis machine powered by a car battery, on the glide-path to obscurity and burial in a dusty, anonymous grave. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
He swore an oath of loyalty (bayat) to Osama Bin Laden. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
And given the ostensible justification -- stated fears of trying these particular defendants on American soil -- the changes would undermine the authority and legitimacy of all federal courts in the United States.? [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:04 am by Adam Wagner
Read more: Terror advice decision causes uproar in United States, but could it happen here? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
Administration officials made statements to the press linking Mr Idris to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, which begins: The owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant sued the United States for unjustifiably destroying the plant, failing to compensate them for its destruction, and defaming them by asserting they had ties to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
The Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of May 27th 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban in order to implement UN Security Council Resolution 1390 (2002). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm by Erin Miller
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”) eliminated the writ of habeas corpus for any “alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
It was also settled before the case could be heard by a jury at the state level. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
And:For example, it was this Texas appeals court that directly and deliberately defied the Justices in Miller-El v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
The Government asserts that it initially detained and interrogated Hamdi in Afghanistan before transferring him to the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay in January 2002. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
United States, 334 U.S. 742, 767 n.9 (1948) (citation omitted), as well as the Supreme Court’s directive in Boumediene that “[i]n considering both the procedural and substantive standards used to impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, proper deference must be accorded to the political branches,” 128 S.Ct. at 2276 (2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
Moreover, El-Hage's ties to Osama Bin Laden created a strong reason to doubt that he could keep the classified information confidential. [read post]