Search for: "United States v. Blair" Results 101 - 120 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
In Syria, the United States once again launched air strikes against the Khorasan group, a faction of the al Nusra Front, on Wednesday night. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A decision from the United States 5th Circuit is a good case to read to understand how the courts look at ERISA claims. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:30 am by Clark
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Wells Bennett
, and Shubert et. al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
The implement or machine becomes [the purchaser’s] private, individual property, not protected by the laws of the United States, but by the laws of the State in which it is situated. [read post]