Search for: "United States v. Bland"
Results 161 - 177
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2008, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
Since the 1970's when the Supreme Court of the United States decided that lawyers could advertise (Bates v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:07 am
by Paul Bland The United States Justice Department has completely disgraced itself. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
Quoting CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
The United States Supreme Court Justices will read a brief from one of the youngest lawyers ever to file before the high court. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bland, No. 06-3223 Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) there was no Brady violation since evidence suppressed by the prosecution was not material to an issue at defendant's trial; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an independent in camera review of the evidence in question. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
While others wore dark overcoats, reflecting the solemnity of the occasion, the representative of the United States, as Givhan colorfully described it, "was dressed in the kind of attire one typically wears to operate a snow blower. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:37 am
" (The AFA has posted a complete audio of the prayer and the interruptions on its website, available here.)As one would expect, Americans United for Separation of Church and State (and no doubt other groups), disapproved of the disruption. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:33 pm
The Court noticed this in Texas Monthly v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
"[16] Besides this bland statement, the E.E.O.C has not been extremely helpful to employers in defining whether certain incentives convert an otherwise voluntary program into an involuntary one through financial coercion. [read post]
