Search for: "United States v. Blount"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Moreover, supporters of the House's decision to impeach Senator Blount may also find this view persuasive. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm
" Justice Story, in discussing the Blount trial, observed that the absence of the word other in the Impeachment Clause "lead[s] to the conclusion" that the President is not "included in the description of civil officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Blount, 106 F. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:48 pm
Blount Cnty., Tennessee, 861 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
As President Trump notes, one of the articles of impeachment [Article 10] charged President Johnson with insulting and denouncing Congress by "mak[ing] and declar[ing] … certain intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues … [which] are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
This provision applies to those who hold "office . . . under" the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
Blount did not hold himself out as a representative of the United States government. [read post]
