Search for: "United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Union City" Results 41 - 60 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Public policy does not nullify the choice she made (cf., Matter of Abramovich v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 450, cert denied 444 US 845). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Board of Education of Township High School District 205, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), and United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  But by treating "houses of worship" as the units from which to sample, a disproportionately heavy representation of Christians is the inev [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division concluded that the arbitration provision of the CBA at issue was broad and that there was a reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute, which involves the EO1's claim that its members are entitled to certain payments for retroactive salary increases, and the general subject matter of the CBA.Noting that some uncertainty existed as to whether the subject matter of the dispute is encompassed within the salary provisions of EO1's CBA or… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm by paperstreet
Michigan Document Services, Inc., 99 F.3d 1381 (6th Cir. 1996); and American Geophysical Union v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:42 am
Board of Education, Rockaway Township the NJ Appellate Division refused to set aside an arbitrator's award revoking a teacher's tenure. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:16 am
Arbitrating an employee’s termination after a random drug test proved positiveLocal 333, United Marine Division, International Longshoreman's Association, AFL-CIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v New York City Department of Transportation, 35 A.D.3d 211, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 9 N.Y.3d 805 A ferryboat deckhand employed by the New York City Department of Transportation [DOT] was terminated because he was unable to provide a urine sample during a… [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Marvin Kirsner
Porpoise Evans Currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by David Urban
Government Expression: Some legal academics and commentators take the view that government entities themselves (states, cities, counties, and public educational institutions) have no First Amendment rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]