Search for: "United States v. Board of Supervisors" Results 41 - 60 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2013, 4:00 am
Including proposed staffing changes in a plan to close schools submitted to the State Education Department does not cloak the staffing issues as a state policy, law or regulation thereby precluding submitting the matter to arbitration Board of Educ.of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Mike Underwood
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:58 pm by Amanda Pickens
On Friday, the United States Supreme Court granted three petitions for certiorari to determine a quickly developing circuit split. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Charles G. Kels
In North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
According to the complaint, there are more than 15,500 McDonald’s restaurants operating in the United States and Canada; about 90 percent of those in the United States operate as a franchise restaurant, with the rest owned and operated directly by McDonald’s Corporate. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm by Howard Friedman
 The court refused to compel the Secretary of the Navy to release selection board members from their oath of confidentiality, to allow them to testify about selection board proceedings.McKeithan v. [read post]