Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 21 - 40
of 847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2005, 5:47 pm
If United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:04 pm
Hastings Law Journal presents Federal Sentencing Reform Ten Years After United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2004, 10:58 am
Booker, No. 04-104, and United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
A snippet from the paper's abstract follows: "In the two years since United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
""United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2004, 6:02 am
United States and Hall v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
By an evenly divided 6-6 vote, the Tenth Circuit denies initial hearing in banc of a case involving sentencing procedure under Booker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
Judge Moore’s comprehensive opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
United States (No. 09-6822) requires the Court to further sort through the implications and consequences of its landmark ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2005, 3:29 pm
From the 7th Circuit we get United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
Here is how the opinion starts: This appeal concerns the question whether, after United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:36 am
Olson Guideline "Departures" at Sentencing by Robert Don Gifford Off The Beaten Path: A Case Study of Unusual Post-Booker Litigation In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:45 pm
Here is the abstract: As a result of the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Booker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:11 pm
In any event, here is the opinion's first paragraph:David Thornton appeals from the district court's decision to not re-sentence him after a limited remand pursuant to United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 8:57 pm
United States (06-7517). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
§ 2255 asserting that a federal sentence must be corrected due to error under United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 12:26 pm
In making that determination, is it consistent with United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 6:30 am
Johnson, JAGC, USN's article in the Journal of Military and Veteran Law in which he argues that the manner in which the Navy counsels Sailors and Marines falls short of the requirements of United States v. [read post]
