Search for: "United States v. Boone" Results 101 - 120 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
He was tracked in Germany by his phone company, and he sued to get his own records to see how minutely his movements could be tracked.In much the same manner, Hughes explained, law enforcement in Texas and across the United States is using call-tracking information in investigations. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:19 am by Mark Graber
  When they were considering how to help persons of color become full citizens of the United States, they spoke the language of color consciousness. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am by Eric Goldman
. * United Airlines sues 22-year-old who found a method for buying cheaper plane tickets. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:59 am by Dennis Crouch
He concluded with a statement that action is needed, otherwise “the United States will continue to cede technological supremacy to China. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm
United States, decided yesterday, the Court struck down provisions of an Arizona statute which conflicted with federal law. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:28 am by Dan Harris
  First, the tort/spill occurred in China, not the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 Yet, it is important to keep in mind that such claim changes are not effective until the proceeding is concluded.This past Monday in Keung Tse v. eBay, Inc., et al (CAND), the Court considered whether cancellation/amendment  of a claim during patent reexamination mooted an otherwise justiciable dispute, explaining: Only claim 21 of United States patent number 6,665,797 is asserted in this action. [read post]