Search for: "United States v. Bowen" Results 141 - 160 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
A public employer does not violate public policy by voluntarily including a reasonable job security provision in a CBA (see Matter of Board of Educ. of Yonkers City School Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 40 NY2d 268, 274-276 [1976]; Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 267 [1976])[FN2].The clause at issue here was not shown to be unreasonable, as the CBA's three-year duration was relatively brief [FN3] (see Matter of Board of Educ. of Yonkers City School Dist.… [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
Theory of domestic violence[11] Once the sheer scale of domestic violence became clear, feminist theorists tried to work out what was happening and why. [12] Here is a useful summary of some of the theories:“The first theory developed in the United States was that men who battered women were mentally ill and that women who remained in violent relationships were also mentally ill. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Plaintiff-appellant West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (West Bend) appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, who consist of a group of insurance companies that includes the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (Fidelity) and Federated Mutual Insurance Company (Federated). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Moreover, Hayes Lemmerz has 4.86 retirees receiving health insurance benefits for every active worker in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:57 am
" United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 am
In this case, the United States government has a majority interest in AIG. [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:34 pm
This, the defendants argue, is the required result applying the decision of Pittfield, J in  Bowen v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
If this kind of Islam grows and prospers in the United States - and this is already happening - it will not stay there. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:47 pm
Homebuyers' rights under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) prohibit any type of kickback or fee-splitting arising from settlement services regardless of whether the homebuyers were overcharged the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently ruled in  Carter v Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc, No 07-3965 (6th Cir, January 23, 2009). [read post]