Search for: "United States v. Bowers" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The reach of Griswold was tested in 1986, in Bowers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
” Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes: “"In the land use context, 42 USC § 1983 protects against municipal actions that violate a property owner's rights to due process, equal protection of the laws and just compensation for the taking of property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution"… [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
” Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes: “"In the land use context, 42 USC § 1983 protects against municipal actions that violate a property owner's rights to due process, equal protection of the laws and just compensation for the taking of property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution"… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am by JB
If Kennedy doesn't want to commit himself to holding that the Constitution requires same-sex marriage everywhere in the United States, he may not be a fifth vote to strike down DOMA.The elephant in the room, of course, is the Perry v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Anna Bower (June 14, 2023) A Primer on the Silent Witness Rule and United States v. [read post]