Search for: "United States v. Branch" Results 101 - 120 of 4,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
  The Court has held that some international claim settlements agreements other than Article II treaties can be given direct effect in domestic courts, as in cases like United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
It is a long-standing policy of the executive branch to simply list “Jerusalem” as the place of birth, as the United States has not officially recognized Israel’s claim over the disputed territory. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Brian Murphy and Jonathan Sokolowski On May 29, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Cuevas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
The student was introduced to the fundamental character of the division of governmental power in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to review the transcript in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:59 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Department of State) has published Foreign Official Immunity After Samantar: A United States Government Perspective (Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 44, no. 5, p. 1141, November 2011). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:44 pm by Jack Goldsmith
”  In support of his submission that the President has broad, undefined powers over foreign affairs, the Secretary quotes United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
§ 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]