Search for: "United States v. Bright" Results 1 - 20 of 1,466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:45 am by Charles Kotuby
The case also has implications for the enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am by Danielle Citron
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:55 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Snyder v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm by Lara
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina ordered defendant Bright Builders, Inc. to pay $770,750.00 in damages for contributory trademark infringement as the result of a jury verdict against it for constructing and providing web hosting services to a company it knew to be infringing on third parties’ trademarks. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
  This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:37 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  Wouldn't there be a U.S. interest in deterring such fraud, reducing private enforcement costs within the United States? [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:43 am by Greg
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently went to great lengths to explain how it came to decision with a different result than the United States Supreme Court in Carpenter v. [read post]