Search for: "United States v. Brims" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:50 am by ernst
Brimming with insight, Church State Corporation provocatively challenges our most basic beliefs about the ties between religion and law in ostensibly secular democracies.Here’s the TOC:Introduction. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Julie Brown
Today marks the start of another term for the Supreme Court of the United States of America. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Proof of acquired distinctiveness may be adduced for all Member States concerned, or separately for different Member States or groups of Member States. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Now there are hundreds of victims, in the United States and Asia. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This is due, Pinker states, because of two actions of the mind: chunking and functional fixity. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Ryke Longest
The United States supported the report’s recommendations. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015)The general offices of the Central Party and State Council recently issued a directive calling for the strengthening of civic education in Chinese universities along the ideological lines specified through the Chinese Communist Party. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:01 am
At present, the US Supreme Court is considering whether the case merits its further review, and has now invited the Solicitor General, Donald Verrilli, to "file a brief in the case expressing the view of the United States" (see here for an explanation of the Solicitor General's role). [read post]