Search for: "United States v. Bristol"
Results 121 - 140
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Bristol Development Co., 62 Cal.2d 861 (California Supreme Court 1965); Romo v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
However NM argued that Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1999] ECC 167 extended this duty to disclose risks where “there is a significant risk which would affect the judgment of a reasonable patient”[4]. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 11:26 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v.... [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
CNSOPB 2014 FC 450 http://t.co/fs3… http://t.co/1Z49KLbQkO -> Doubt cast over proposed UK laws on private copying http://t.co/SGoRb2p6S3 -> EU calls for radical copyright reform in light of internet’s disruption http://t.co/Sb03kkzzXm via @V3_co_uk -> The Problem with the Aereo Dissent http://t.co/V3ehYt01Vc -> The United States Supreme Court endorses digital privacy in a landmark decision http://t.co/KGxH3Zu3YP -> The Supreme Court Considers Google… [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
After a four-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware found claim 8 of U.S. [read post]
30 May 2014, 2:49 am
The investigation of this case was conducted by United States Secret Service, United States Marshals Service, and the Virginia State Police. [read post]
9 May 2014, 1:09 pm
The most recent example comes out of the First Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
