Search for: "United States v. Bruce"
Results 21 - 40
of 948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Bruce Babbitt, a Democrat. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm
Moore has been appointed by various United States District Courts to serve as Umpire on multiple occasions. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Rev. 1219 (1993); Bruce A. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
United States Should Not be Embraced appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:16 pm
Anybody interested in reading the full text of our "originalist" brief should go to https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and then search for the name "Bruce Ackerman". [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
Bruce AckermanIn Moore v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Stephen Bruce has posted a new version with "more history" of his article on the compulsory arbitration decision, Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:21 am
In a recent decision, Bruce v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
