Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 181 - 200 of 9,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 9:12 am by Matt Osenga
United States Brief The Solicitor began the brief by arguing that § 282? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by Jane Chong
The detainees argued that (1) the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Unknown
More info is provided in this blog post.Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (11 Jan. 2023) [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:38 am by Steven G. Pearl
Behrend, ___ U.S. ___ (3/27/13), a 5-4 majority of the United States Supreme Court reversed a district court order granting class certification in an antitrust action. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
The United States Supreme Court has just issued a 5-4 ruling on an age discrimination issue in Kentucky Retirement System v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm by Zachary Spilman
Finding first that Appellant introduced deadly force into the situation, thereby eliminating the ability of further escalation, citing United States v. [read post]