Search for: "United States v. Burnett" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
On appeal, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.' Burnett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:38 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
’” Kipu relied, in part, on case law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Degussa Admixtures, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:25 am by Christina Burnett
An earlier article examined alien land laws in the United States, telling the story of Oyama v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has covered the Department of Justice’s plans to restrict the encryption of communications data. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
 Photo from Managed Grazing in Riparian Areas, and online resource prepared by the National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, funded under a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:54 am by Chip Merlin
Guy "Sandy" Burnette invited me to speak at the International Association of Special Investigation Units over a decade ago. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]