Search for: "United States v. Butler"
Results 241 - 260
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Butler v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:20 am
Marsh v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
United States (1938). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Butler of The Butler Firm in San Diego, who attended yesterday's oral argument in Iskanian v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Butler, 13-430; and Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Butler, 13-430; and Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Butler, 13-430; and Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Butler, 13-430; and Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Amicus Curiae Brief of United States at 5 n.2. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
United States and the treaty power. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
