Search for: "United States v. CERTAIN LANDS, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
In Shelley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Currently, aliens arriving at a United States port of entry with a nonimmigrant visa, or those traveling without a visa as part of the Visa Waiver Program, are subject to US-VISIT requirements with certain limited exceptions. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Open source software is written by people with good jobs: the landed gentry of the modern technological era. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:52 am
Dominic Lawson, writing in the i newspaper, summed it up quite well when he stated that many who read of the exploits of the shaggers… actors, footballers etc etc – role models for the future of our Big Society – are more likely to be impressed than horrified. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
The public comment period for the Proposed Rule expires on April 8, 2024.[1] Affected Transactions and Transferees The Proposed Rule broadly captures transactions involving residential real property (including single-family houses, townhouses, condominiums, and cooperatives, as well as apartment buildings designed for one to four families) located anywhere in the United States (including any Indian lands, as that term is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory… [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:00 am
”); Two-Way Media LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
[OK, if you say so, though I kind of thought the restraints on states’ abrogation of contracts, ex post facto laws, etc. were mandatory and ©/patent were optional.] [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
” Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act subjects certain States and political subdivisions to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which invades the sovereignty of these “covered” jurisdictions by requiring them to “preclear” all voting changes (redistricting, moving polling places, etc.) with the United States Department of Justice or the District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
" As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Proponents of adhering strictly to classic (or “absolute”) neutrality rules, such as those outlined in the 1907 Hague Conventions V and XIII Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land and in Naval War, argue that certain types of support violates neutral States’ legal obligations of abstention (or non-participation) and impartiality and thereby constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
