Search for: "United States v. CERTAIN LANDS, ETC." Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
., number and type of projects approved, applications made, construction data, etc.) as specified, to the Department of Housing and Community Development. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Write down name of Police Officers, Department and Badge Number, Ambulance crew, etc.9. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
General Assembly (A/72/162) (the 2017 WG Report) sought to unpacks the concept of access to effective remedies under the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Robert Chesney
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
  In feudal European societies it was shameful and often even illegal to sell or mortgage land: a lord’s duty was to preserve his land and devise it intact to his eldest son. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
” To be sure, certain IC collection activities are authorized, prohibited or regulated by statute. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [OK, if you say so, though I kind of thought the restraints on states’ abrogation of contracts, ex post facto laws, etc. were mandatory and ©/patent were optional.] [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  [2]        The solicitors contend that, on a proper construction of the liquidator’s own pleadings and without the need for evidence, it can be seen that certain obligations have been extinguished by the passage of time in terms of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
Circuit has made clear on numerous occasions (for example, in Holy Land Foundation v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:40 am by Todd Henderson
It is based on the idea that state officials have to make countless discretionary decisions – give benefits to X and deny them to Y; kick in the door of Y’s house, not X’s; etc. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
Mr Watson advised that in the event of him receiving instructions to do so, he was willing to excise from the file certain material in order to assist the police inquiry. [read post]