Search for: "United States v. COMMANDING OFFICER, ETC."
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
I think you’ll find my summer 2017 Lawfare piece (the one I cite above, concerning Cyber Command and the Islamic State) helpful on this question. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Mutiny, and rebellion on shipboard by two or more passengers against the authority of the commander of the ship, or by the crew or part of the crew, against the commander or the ship’s officers. 5. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Annunziata, etc. etc. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis failed to depart the United States as required by the visa. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Etc. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:45 am
The CGCCA has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
First, the Amars assume—without any analysis—the phrases "Officers of the United States" and "Office under the United States" both had the same meaning in 1788 and in 1868. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
Live outside the United States? [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:07 pm
Perhaps discussion of the November 30, 2009, opinion by the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
United States, the seminal case on which the Printz anti-commandeering ruling is itself based, is extremely instructive. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1948); Woodward v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
” I think the answer is exactly what Trump said it meant: keeping terrorists out of the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In Abassi etc. the decision under challenge was a discretionary decision relating to foreign policy. [read post]
