Search for: "United States v. CTH"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:54 pm
The driver also requested the FWC to consider a 2016 United Kingdom decision[2] which found another Uber driver to be a “worker” (UK Decision). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm
For those reasons, this article compares the implementation of the Model Law in Australia, Great Britain and the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:01 pm
The Second Test Case follows a number of business interruption cases in Australia including: Rockment Pty Ltd t/a Vanilla Lounge v AAI Limited t/a Vero Insurance [2020] FCAFC 228 considering a Biosecurity Act 2015(Cth) (Biosecurity Act) exclusion; HDI Global Speciality SE v Wonkana No. 3 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 296 (First Test Case) considering an outdated exclusion clause which referred to the repealed Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) (Quarantine Act), see our update on… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
Facebook Inc applied to set aside the orders for its service in the United States, among other things. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
Recognition of non-state law? [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:54 pm
The Court approved United States authorities consistent with this narrow approach to the public policy exception (Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co, Inc v Société Générale De L’Industrie Du Papier, 508 F 2d 969 (2d Cir 1974); Karaha Bodas Co, LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara, 364 F 3d 274 at 306 (2004)) and disapproved previous Australian authorities supporting a broader approach (Resort Condominiums… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 pm
Australia’s legal regime is similar to the United States in that there is a federal government and separate state/territory governments with their own autonomy. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
To date, though the pandemic is a global health and economic phenomenon, the pandemic-related securities litigation activity has been limited to the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This phrase, as well as its accompanying ‘Walking Fingers’ logo, are registered trade marks in many countries around the world, including the UK, Canada, and Australia – though curiously not the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Depending upon the nature, degree and persistence of any such online abuse (or indeed offline abuse), legal remedies in harassment might be available to individuals in such circumstances: see the Harassment Act 1997 (New Zealand); the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (United Kingdom); and, in Australia, criminal sanction is provided for in Commonwealth, and State and Territory statutes (for example, Criminal Code (Cth), s 189; Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld), s 395B; and… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
Persia NavidiReaders of this blog well know that one of the current hot topics in the world of D&O is ESG – and not just in the United States, but in Europe, and elsewhere as well. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
The appellants, thirty-four Australian and United States companies, either own or exclusively license the copyright in thousands of commercially released films and television programs ("the appellants' films"). [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
Gibbs has been described as irreconcilable with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency 1997 (the 1997 Model Law),[16] which is generally[17] regarded as embodying ‘modified universalism’. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
Article 31 of the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted by the United Nations in 2007 and provides that:‘1. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:33 pm
If you require assistance in regards to addressing these risks or have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please do not hesitate to contact us. [1] ‘Flexible work post-COVID’, Australian Government Workplace Gender Equality Agency (Web Page, 8 December 2021). [2] ‘Interim Report’, Senate Select Committee on Work and Care (Report, October 2022). [3] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 114(1) (‘FW Act’). [4] FW Act s 114(2)-(3). [5]… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
