Search for: "United States v. CYR" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 8:15 am by Gregory Dell
June 22, 2011 - A recent opinion from the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals has helped clarify the rules as to who you can sue in actions for benefits under a long term disability policy See Cyr v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:10 pm
After years of uncertainty, an important legal question was finally resolved by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in an opinion, Cyr v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:33 am by Kit Johnson
Background The petitioners, Pedro Pablo Guerrero-Lasprilla and Ruben Ovalles, are noncitizens and former lawful permanent residents who filed motions to reopen the cases that led to their removal from the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In June 2016, Thuraissigiam escaped from Sri Lanka and entered the United States in February 2017. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm by Kevin Johnson
  Assistant to the Solicitor General Eric Miller argued the case for the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am by Jessica Zhang
Cyr would have been released back into the United States if he was granted cancellation of removal, while petitioners in this case are ultimately seeking withholding of removal, which protects them from removal only to Iraq and not a safe third country. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:38 am by Jennifer Chacon
Nasrallah, a native and citizen of Lebanon, entered the United States in 2006 on a visitor visa and became a lawful permanent resident in 2007. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
He escaped Sri Lanka to Mexico in June 2016 and in February 2017 crossed the border and entered the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm by Tyler S St Cyr
  While there isn’t any uniform method of analysis among the courts, the United States Supreme Court set out a guidepost in Monel v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 5:35 pm
United States (1973), the Supreme Court explained that the local D.C. courts were Article I courts, not Article III courts. [read post]