Search for: "United States v. Carmack" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 9:24 am by Kevin Russell
  The plaintiffs argued that the forum selection clause of their contracts were invalid under the Carmack Amendment, which, as relevant here, pertains to rail transportation within the United States and would trump the COGSA. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Law Professors Amicus brief of New Jersey Public Advocate Amicus brief of the United States (grant) Supplemental brief of respondents No. 09-475, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
Regal-Beloit Corp. (08-1553 and 08-1554) Argued: Mar. 24, 2010 Issue: Whether the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which governs certain rail and motor transportation by common carriers within the United States, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 2:59 pm by Mark Murakami
The Question Presented is: Whether the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which governs certain rail and motor transportation by common carriers within the United States, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
Regal-Beloit Corporation Issue: Whether the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which governs certain rail and motor transportation by common carriers within the United States, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:42 am
Tushnet, one of the pre-eminent constitutional scholars in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
United States, 350 U.S. 162, 166 n. 9 (1956).. . .There is a split in the federal circuit courts concerning the standard to be used to determine whether a shipper's damages claim is sufficient. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]