Search for: "United States v. Caronia"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
This Article demonstrates that—as suggested in the dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Caronia, where an individual successfully challenges the FDA’s off-label speech rules. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) – to the extent that’s even possible under United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
Then, in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
Then, in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
Then, in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:34 pm
The parties’ March 8, 2016 proposed order of settlement includes the following provisions: Defendants agree to be bound by the Court’s conclusion that Amarin may engage in truthful and non-misleading speech promoting the off-label use of Vascepa and, under United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:32 am
” Brief of United States, United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
"Judge Callahan holds, however, that there's precisely such “clearly irreconcilable” intervening authority: Sorrell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLP, 806 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2015). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
As the plaintiff, the entity can choose the forum in which to sue, and given the Caronia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
United States of America, 1:09-cv-01879-JDB (D.D.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
Whether Judge Ronnie Abrams will follow suit, of course, remains to be seen, but Pacira has Second Circuit precedent—United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), protecting promotional communications as commercial speech; next, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Public Service Commission, is a “a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech,” 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980), we’re certain that mining the government’s briefs in prior First Amendment litigation such as United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:15 am
Although the Second Circuit’s December 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:51 pm
The District Court has now issued its order and granted Amarin the injunction it requested, in what surely will be considered a landmark ruling regarding the First Amendment and truthful, non-misleading off-label promotion, alongside the Second Circuit’s United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:33 am
Ct. 2653 (2011) and United States v. [read post]
