Search for: "United States v. Carr" Results 121 - 140 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
 In Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am by Dominic Adair
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 2:48 pm by Kent Scheidegger
This case was decided on remand from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am by Amy Howe
” At Notice and Comment, David Rubinstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram discuss United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
Madison stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the president is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Adam Klein
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Adam Klein
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
In this one, Annsley reports about the speeches of Maria Martin-Prat (Head of Unit - Copyright, DG Connect at the European Commission), Michele Woods (Director, Copyright Law Division, WIPO), Maria Pallante (Register of Copyrights, US Copyright Office), and many others IP-enthusiasts about the role of copyright and trade marks in the new, digital, multisensory IP world.* Fordham 2016: Outstanding patent issues - the UPC, dual-track systems and Alice v CLS BankFrom trade marks and… [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:05 am by Andrew Hamm
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that, if the Justices “approach their task as judges and not as politicians, the administration will easily prevail” in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
However, this subsection shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Florida. [read post]