Search for: "United States v. Carvin"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
United States, involving the Treaty Power and the structural limits of federal authority, Schuette v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
United States metastasized into a massive system restraining the speech of millions. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:36 pm
The Respondents divided their argument, with Solicitor General Elena Kagan arguing for the United States (as intervenor) and Jeffrey Lamken from MoloLamken LLP for the PCAOB. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Times by Jeffrey Kayes discusses the possibility that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano may weigh in on the Arizona statute at issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:09 am
Below, relying on the High Court’s 1977 ruling in Abood v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:02 pm
It relied heavily upon the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
Writing a brief for the United States before the Supreme Court is a very different enterprise than writing a brief for a private party. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
United States applies retroactively. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
Remember, in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
’s Bancroft represents the state attorneys general, and Michael Carvin of Jones Day is counsel to the NFIB. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
Pool equipment Carvin inc. , 2014 QCCS 2400 Davydiuk v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
Philip Morris: Topping the list is United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (11-393), United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
