Search for: "United States v. Certain Parcels of Land" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 10:57 am by Andrew Alberg
A few months before the law was repealed, the Government granted an 83-acre parcel of land in Wyoming to Melvin and Lulu Brandt in fee simple, with an exception for rights granted to a certain railroad company under the Act of 1875. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:19 am by Joe Koncelik
 The Takings Clause of Article V of the United States Constitution states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” But the voting rights of American Indians and Alaska Natives have been further eroded or ignored since the United States Supreme Court overturned a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
In Dixon, the court held that a corporate "interest or expectancy" requires something more than the mere opportunity to develop a neighboring parcel of land. [read post]
Department of Agriculture has recognized that heirs’ property has been the leading cause of Black involuntary land loss in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]