Search for: "United States v. Certain Parcels of Land" Results 61 - 80 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” But the voting rights of American Indians and Alaska Natives have been further eroded or ignored since the United States Supreme Court overturned a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 am by Austin Turner
Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013), protections established under both the state and federal constitutions have been expanded to apply in the context of certain land use and zoning decisions requiring local government-imposed exactions or conditions to satisfy the following two (2) legal standards initially articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Nollan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm by Amy Howe
But the state appeals court disagreed and ruled that the two parcels should be considered as one; if the parcels are viewed together, the siblings were not deprived of all of the value of their land – a requirement for a taking. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
But the state appeals court disagreed and ruled that the two parcels should be considered as one; if the parcels are viewed together, the siblings were not deprived of all of the value of their land – a requirement for a taking. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
  The residential parcel is known as “Lot 9” in the 9-unit residential subdivision known as Hidden Hills. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:14 am by Patricia Salkin
The City of Fargo appealed under the equal protection clauses of the North Dakota and United States Constitutions. [read post]