Search for: "United States v. Certain Real Property"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
Generally, the Costa-Hawkins Act authorizes an owner of residential real property to establish the initial rental rate for a dwelling or unit, except in specified circumstances, including: (i) when the residential real property has a certificate of occupancy issued after February 1, 1995; (ii) when the residential real property has already been exempt from the residential rent control ordinance of a public entity on or before February 1,… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
The Marketable Record Title Act is a piece of legislation adopted by many states in the United States with the aim of clarifying and simplifying real property titles. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
The benefits of filing a Form 1024-A would include public recognition of 501(c)(4) status and potential exemption from state taxes. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
The public comment period for the Proposed Rule expires on April 8, 2024.[1] Affected Transactions and Transferees The Proposed Rule broadly captures transactions involving residential real property (including single-family houses, townhouses, condominiums, and cooperatives, as well as apartment buildings designed for one to four families) located anywhere in the United States (including any Indian lands, as that term is defined in the Indian Gaming… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
Legislation - 118th Congress Bulletinhttp://narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/118_uslegislation.html H.R.7663 - To amend title 40, United States Code, to include Indian Tribes among entities that may receive Federal surplus real property for certain purposes, and for other purposes. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:58 am
Notably, the 2023 Thaler v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
103 (2017), University of Chicago Law School, citing Hans v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
As such, it is responsible for the damage caused to Ukraine and its people, including their property, by its unlawful war. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Although states have a sovereign right under international law to take property held by nationals or aliens, there are certain rules that attach to such takings: property must be accompanied by compensation and taken for a public purpose, on a non-discriminatory basis, and in accordance with due process of law. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
In Abitron, the opinion of the Court insisted that “Congress has premised liability on a specific action (a particular sort of use in commerce),” and further stated that both 32 and 43(a) “treat confusion as a means to limit liability to only certain ‘bona fide use[s] of a mark in the ordinary course of trade. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
