Search for: "United States v. Chavez"
Results 21 - 40
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California fully denying Snap’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:34 am
Franklin also owns several firearms, which the Government contends “have long been recognized as being ‘tools of the drug trade.'” [Doc. 87 at 6 n.2 (quoting in part United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 742-743 (1979) (telephone call logs conveyed to telephone company); United States v. [read post]
Justices will revisit whether certain noncitizens in lengthy detention are entitled to bond hearings
10 Jan 2022, 9:40 am
In search of safety, he returned to the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:49 pm
His commentary on Epic v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:35 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 8:47 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:55 pm
Guzman Chavez. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:57 pm
In an opinion on Tuesday in Johnson v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 12:58 pm
Petitioner Agusto Niz-Chavez had received precisely that kind of two-part notice before he had accrued 10 years of physical presence in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 11:07 am
"] Today, the Supreme Court decided Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
United States, 585 U. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 7:56 am
Johnson Today, SCOTUS issued an opinion in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am
The new case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Guzman Chavez: The case involves noncitizens who are subject to reinstated removal orders, which are issued when a noncitizen has illegally reentered the United States after having been removed. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
This scheme appears at odds with the [United States Supreme Court’s] observation that ‘defendants who do not kill, intend to kill, or foresee that life will be taken are categorically less deserving of the most serious forms of punishment than are murderers. . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am
That is a position the United States did not otherwise advance, that no circuit has taken and that none of the justices pursued at argument. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:19 am
The United States finally invokes Chevron USA v. [read post]
