Search for: "United States v. Cherokee Nation" Results 181 - 200 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
In general, though, legal Indianness requires indigenous ancestry (descent from a group indigenous to what is now the United States) and some kind of political recognition. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:35 am by Howard Wasserman
  It’s like the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:49 pm by Gregory Forman
In a highly anticipated case that generated much local notoriety, and in which some of my friends and colleagues participated, the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
It’s so easy to attack the Cherokee Nation on blood quantum. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Amy Howe
  Thomas began by noting that Genesis “comes to us from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 7:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 – The Battle for Baby Veronica (listen) The United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
These topics both reveal the imperial nature of expansion and help to explain the difficulties in recognizing it as such.Chief Justice John Marshall famously ruled in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
As a judge for the Cherokee Nation, she in 2006 wrote the majority opinion in Allen v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:48 am by National Indian Law Library
United States (enrollment, tribal government)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: In re Zylena R. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here’s the final series of the initial round of 32: Match-up No. 13 (2) The Kansas Indians (72US737) — Tax case giving real-world life to the Worcester holding about state law v. (31) Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:55 am
The company was organized under Oklahoma state law and wholly owned by a tribal corporation, which was in turn regulated by the Cherokee Nation. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:41 pm by P.J. Blount
On January 23, 2012, the United States Supreme Court Ruled on the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States; a very slippery opinion by Chief Justice Hughes.1935-1936:  The Court invalidates many other New Deal statutes1936:  FDR is reelected overwhelmingly and the Democrats rule the roost for decades.Some generations played out a little differently. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:50 am by Kate Fort
In his job with the SG he represented the federal government in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]